![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Deep Diving in the Social Media Dumpster? No, thank you.
I've been pondering this post for a while now:
Janet Reid, Literary Agent: Getting Ready to Query? Clean up your social media.
Based on what I know of Ms. Reid, I doubt she's screening for anything other than really egregious asshattery. (As, indeed, she has clarified in a follow-up post.) But I also think it's a terribly dangerous precedent: once you ask creatives (or anyone, really) to self-censor the big things, the not-quite-so-big things will look bigger for the lack of contrast, and when they're gone the medium-sized things will loom larger, and so on, until ultimately you're running scared from people who might get offended by the word "the". And of course, as people get more and more bent about smaller and smaller things, tomorrow's cancel-culture shitstorm is today's perfectly innocuous remark. So maybe you'd better not make that remark, or any remark at all, eh? Just sit silently and let the right-thinking people dominate the social narrative.
And to explicitly link cowering from the torch-bearing mob (because that's what this is, really) to one's chances of finding representation, of having a writing career...? I know publishing is a business, not a moral crusade, but I expected better, I really did.
I recommend reading both the post and the comments. There are some eloquent objections in there to sanitizing one's entire persona out of fear of cancel culture overreactions, not to mention the intractable challenge of trying to guess what someone, somewhere, somewhen is going to take exception to.
As for my own journal, I really doubt there's anything all that exciting in here anyway. But after reading those comments, I feel the need to take my tiny little bit of a stand, so:
Dear agents: I am not scrubbing my social media. This is me. If that's not going to work for you, best we find out now, eh?
Janet Reid, Literary Agent: Getting Ready to Query? Clean up your social media.
Based on what I know of Ms. Reid, I doubt she's screening for anything other than really egregious asshattery. (As, indeed, she has clarified in a follow-up post.) But I also think it's a terribly dangerous precedent: once you ask creatives (or anyone, really) to self-censor the big things, the not-quite-so-big things will look bigger for the lack of contrast, and when they're gone the medium-sized things will loom larger, and so on, until ultimately you're running scared from people who might get offended by the word "the". And of course, as people get more and more bent about smaller and smaller things, tomorrow's cancel-culture shitstorm is today's perfectly innocuous remark. So maybe you'd better not make that remark, or any remark at all, eh? Just sit silently and let the right-thinking people dominate the social narrative.
And to explicitly link cowering from the torch-bearing mob (because that's what this is, really) to one's chances of finding representation, of having a writing career...? I know publishing is a business, not a moral crusade, but I expected better, I really did.
I recommend reading both the post and the comments. There are some eloquent objections in there to sanitizing one's entire persona out of fear of cancel culture overreactions, not to mention the intractable challenge of trying to guess what someone, somewhere, somewhen is going to take exception to.
As for my own journal, I really doubt there's anything all that exciting in here anyway. But after reading those comments, I feel the need to take my tiny little bit of a stand, so:
Dear agents: I am not scrubbing my social media. This is me. If that's not going to work for you, best we find out now, eh?
no subject
no subject
"BUT, there's a brand new sport of deep diving into your past that makes the Red Scare of the 50's look like a walk in the park."
Now, I think JR herself means that time ten years ago when a poster might have misread the line between "take a stand but don't be an ass-hat". But that reference to McCarthyism isn't in there by accident. And even in the original post, she makes a distinction between what she used to do, which was pretty much the standard screening for unprofessional behavior, and what she's doing now, which is screening for anything that might get author+agent into "hot water".
The fact that the agent herself can't define specifically what she's looking for, because what might get you into hot water changes daily and depends entirely on what the person attacking you thinks they can get mileage out of, IMNSHO only demonstrates exactly how ridiculous the situation has gotten.
no subject
There's a thread circulating on Twitter right now, from a lesbian mom, talking about all the steps she's taking to essentially go back into the closet, as far as she's able. I think there's a lot of fear at the moment.
Oddly enough, the fear seems to be throughout the political spectrum. Before the pandemic, my county (60% Republican, 40% Democrat) held gatherings where county residents from a wide variety of backgrounds could get to know each other. We could use more of that.
no subject
That gathering sounds great. We definitely need more of that sort of thing.
no subject
Co-author and I thought it was ridiculous and it didn't harm us financially or career-wise. If we'd chosen to fight it we probably could have won? It wasn't fiction, and it wasn't the agent refusing to sign me. But I'm mentioning it as pertinent to the blogger's advice.
The original edition of the book continues to sell pretty well.
no subject
That sort of nonsense makes me want to throw things, regardless of whether it comes from the conservative side or from the self-proclaimed "woke" or whoever.
no subject
no subject