lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
Attempting to anonymize this sufficiently to avoid specific wank. Hopefully it hasn't resulted in complete incoherence.


Read more... )

So, internet person who's reading this, what do you think I should do? What would you do, in similar circumstances? And why?

lizvogel: A jar of almonds that warns that it contains almonds. (Stupid Planet)
I just bought a bunch of Baen books.

It's a small thing, but it's what I can do.

lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
I've been pondering this post for a while now:

Janet Reid, Literary Agent: Getting Ready to Query? Clean up your social media.

Based on what I know of Ms. Reid, I doubt she's screening for anything other than really egregious asshattery. (As, indeed, she has clarified in a follow-up post.) But I also think it's a terribly dangerous precedent: once you ask creatives (or anyone, really) to self-censor the big things, the not-quite-so-big things will look bigger for the lack of contrast, and when they're gone the medium-sized things will loom larger, and so on, until ultimately you're running scared from people who might get offended by the word "the". And of course, as people get more and more bent about smaller and smaller things, tomorrow's cancel-culture shitstorm is today's perfectly innocuous remark. So maybe you'd better not make that remark, or any remark at all, eh? Just sit silently and let the right-thinking people dominate the social narrative.

And to explicitly link cowering from the torch-bearing mob (because that's what this is, really) to one's chances of finding representation, of having a writing career...? I know publishing is a business, not a moral crusade, but I expected better, I really did.

I recommend reading both the post and the comments. There are some eloquent objections in there to sanitizing one's entire persona out of fear of cancel culture overreactions, not to mention the intractable challenge of trying to guess what someone, somewhere, somewhen is going to take exception to.

As for my own journal, I really doubt there's anything all that exciting in here anyway. But after reading those comments, I feel the need to take my tiny little bit of a stand, so:

Dear agents: I am not scrubbing my social media. This is me. If that's not going to work for you, best we find out now, eh?

lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
Because important.

Military leadership defends right to protest.

“Every member of the U.S. military swears an oath to support and defend the Constitution and the values embedded within it,” Milley wrote. “This document is founded on the essential principles that all men and women are born free and equal and should be treated with respect and dignity. It also gives Americans the right to freedom of speech and peaceful assembly.”

     (Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff)


Includes the full text of both the memo from the chairman to the Joint Chiefs and the memo from the Sec'y of Defense to all service personnel.

lizvogel: A jar of almonds that warns that it contains almonds. (Stupid Planet)
It's that time of year again, when the state sends birthday greetings in the form of a hefty fee and extra paperwork. This year Michigan (and probably other states, but I can only speak for Michigan) is pushing the "Real ID" thing, in which the driver's license that's tied to bank accounts, utilities, and a host of other identity-establishing things has to be verified by a piece of paper that's sat untouched in a drawer for multiple decades. Because yeah, that makes any kind of logical sense.

The Real ID license will be designated by a gold-circled star in the corner. The first, most obvious question this brings to mind is, who flunked history badly enough to think that was a good idea? I went ahead and did it, because the process was painless enough and it'll be one less thing to deal with later, but also because I decided to embrace the irony.

I'm surprised by how uncomfortable I am at the prospect of having my little star ID badge. I don't have any ancestry that would make this personally significant, but first they came for whoever....
lizvogel: Earth gate symbol: Mostly Harmless (Earth: Mostly Harmless)
I am tempted to turn this into a t-shirt. It's feeling pointedly poignant for the world these days.

https://dailyotter.org/posts/2017/9/18/if-we-lean-against-each-other-neither-of-us-will-fall
lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
So, there was 4th Street.   cut for length... )

Just This One

Thursday, November 10th, 2016 09:22 am
lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
I wasn't going to say anything about the election, but I feel the need to put something above Tuesday's then-humorous post.

So, a few calming reflections.

- We can probably trust to bureaucratic inertia to scotch the more wacked-out ideas. Recreating the Great Wall of China is not really feasible for a country that can't even keep its existing roads and bridges properly paved, for example.

- Regardless of who won, I still would have been at the mechanic's yesterday getting the car seen to. Regardless of who won, I still would have needed to clean the toilet. And the cats would still be cute. Whose butt is in the Oval Office does not really affect most people's day-to-day lives.

- We don't actually know what the election-winner's going to do. We know what he thought would get him publicity (and he was right). Those may not be the same thing; we're talking about a reality TV show star here, remember. I'm not suggesting he's some kind of undercover saint, but let's see what actually happens before cranking up the hysteria, eh?

- This too shall pass. Although I am somewhat a subscriber to the Great (or Awful) Man theory of history, the truth is that one person generally can't shift the destiny of an entire country. Eight years ago, there were plenty of people proclaiming the end of the world, but the world's still here. I suspect it'll still be here four years from now, too.

- Finally, we can't control what the guy in the White House does. We can control what we do. This was one of the most acrimonious campaigns on record, and that stems directly from the acrimonious, sound-bite-driven, over-reaction-as-a-tool-of-silencing society we now live in. But we don't have to. If you're talking to someone you disagree with and your immediate response is to take what they say to the most egregious extreme and then vilify them for it, you're part of the problem. If you immediately assume anyone not jumping on your bandwagon is on the other side and attack them for it, you're part of the problem. But if you read or listen to what they're actually saying, and take the time to engage with it with civility and the assumption of good faith, you might just be part of the solution.

lizvogel: A jar of almonds that warns that it contains almonds. (Stupid Planet)
And now, I can't resist this.

Cthulhu / Voldemort 2016

Are you sure it's the greater evil?


lizvogel: Banana: Good.  Crossed streams: Bad. (Good Bad)
The upcoming votes on SOPA and PIPA were dropped by Congress today. Damn, people, we did it!

There'll be another bout, of course. There always is. But for the moment, at least, we've won this one.

Check out the numbers here. I particularly like the counts of "Senators publicly against PIPA".

Profile

lizvogel

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Tags

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags